![]() The negative reaction is also an assertion of an idealized view of literature, which holds that the function of adolescent fiction is to educate readers on the aesthetic function of language and sound moral values. It seeks to show that hostility towards teenlit reflects a concern for the maintenance of standard Indonesian as the language of literature amid a rapidly changing language situation in which a major colloquial variety of Indonesian has been gaining prominence and encroaching on domains prescriptively associated with the standard variety, such as written literature. This article ex- amines a representative example of such criticisms as a platform for discussing the relationship between the relatively new genre of adolescent literature and the wider context of language change. Mean- while, hostile critics consider it as nothing more than light fiction containing questionable moral values, written in an unacceptable style. Sympathetic literary critics view young people’s attraction to it as a positive process towards the development of a healthy reading and writing habit. ![]() Its rapid rise has invited both favourable and hostile reactions from observ- ers. Teenlit,a genre of popular literature for adolescents, was introduced to Indonesia around the beginning of the last decade and almost immediately attracted a large readership consisting predominantly of female adolescents.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |